Loja

dhl debug mode is on - to hide these messages, turn debug mode off in the settings.
DHL REQUEST: Reveal
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<p:DCTRequest xmlns:p="http://www.dhl.com" xmlns:p1="http://www.dhl.com/datatypes" xmlns:p2="http://www.dhl.com/DCTRequestdatatypes" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dhl.com DCT-req.xsd ">
  <GetQuote>
    <Request>
        <ServiceHeader>
            <MessageTime>2020-02-16T21:18:18</MessageTime>
            <MessageReference>1234567890123456789012345678901</MessageReference>
            <SiteID>v62_VELm3AUvSx</SiteID>
            <Password>ds94CbQCmd</Password>
        </ServiceHeader>
    </Request>
    <From>
      <CountryCode>PT</CountryCode>
      <Postalcode>4420-356</Postalcode><City>Gondomar</City>
    </From>
    <BkgDetails>
      <PaymentCountryCode>PT</PaymentCountryCode>
      <Date>2020-02-17</Date>
      <ReadyTime>PT10H21M</ReadyTime>
      <DimensionUnit>CM</DimensionUnit>
      <WeightUnit>KG</WeightUnit>
      <Pieces>
        
      </Pieces>
      <PaymentAccountNumber>308031904</PaymentAccountNumber>
      <IsDutiable>N</IsDutiable>
      <NetworkTypeCode>AL</NetworkTypeCode>
      
      
    </BkgDetails>
    <To>
      <CountryCode>PT</CountryCode>
      <Postalcode></Postalcode>
    </To>
    
  </GetQuote>
</p:DCTRequest>
DHL RESPONSE: Reveal
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><res:ErrorResponse xmlns:res='http://www.dhl.com' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation= 'http://www.dhl.com err-res.xsd'>
    <Response>
        <ServiceHeader>
            <MessageTime>2020-02-16T22:18:20.281+01:00</MessageTime>
            <MessageReference>1234567890123456789012345678901</MessageReference>
            <SiteID>v62_VELm3AUvSx</SiteID>
            <Password>v62_VELm3AUvSx</Password>
        </ServiceHeader>
        <Status>
            <ActionStatus>Error</ActionStatus>
            <Condition>
                <ConditionCode>111</ConditionCode>
                <ConditionData>Error in parsing request XML:Error: The content of element type &quot;Pieces&quot; is
                    incomplete, it must match
                    &quot;(Piece,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?,Piece?)&quot;.
                    at line 24, column 17</ConditionData>
            </Condition>
        </Status>
    </Response></res:ErrorResponse><!-- ServiceInvocationId:20200216221820_96ab_3aa9ec40-c407-458e-8fa9-b75636ef1dd6 -->

Brincos / Grandes

Mulher /

Dupla de Saxofones

80.00

Brincos inspirados na forma dos Saxofones.

 

REF: 17BRJZ10A Categorias: , , Etiquetas: , , , ,
Descrição

Peso: 16,50g
Origem: Portugal
Materiais: Prata 925

Informações adicionais
Peso 0.01650 g
Dimensões (C x L x A) 6 x 6 x 1.5 cm
Avaliações (0)

Avaliações

Não existem opiniões ainda.

Seja o primeiro a avaliar “Dupla de Saxofones”

O seu endereço de email não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios marcados com *